منابع مشابه
The King-Armstrong method.
message was that those who use a KingArmstrongmethod should standardize it by the manual method of King and Wootton (1956). Although most clinical chemists in the United Kingdom still use either a manual or mechanized King-Armstrong method, little help was offered to the increasing numbers of clinical chemists using either ,B-glycerophosphate or pnitrophenol phosphate as substrate. The relative...
متن کاملThe King Institute, Guindy
Much experimental work was done in connection with the experimental lilters at Guintly and at the Corporation filters. The conclusion is reached that "in some way or other sand filtration exercises a selective action on water bacteria, and that in general the lactose fermenters are much more completely eliminated than other kinds. In other words, and as compared to English results, the total co...
متن کاملDesign comparison of experimental storm water detention systems treating concentrated road runoff.
The aim was to assess the treatment efficiencies of experimental storm water detention (extended storage) systems based on the Atlantis Water Management Limited detention cells receiving concentrated runoff that has been primarily treated by filtration with different inert aggregates. Randomly collected gully pot liquor was used in stead of road runoff. To test for a 'worst case scenario', the ...
متن کاملStorm Flow Response to Road Building and Partial Cutting In Small Streams of Northern California
To assess the influence of road building and logging on storm flow response, a pair of watersheds were studied at Caspar Creek near Fort Bragg in northern California from 1963 to 1975. Selection cutting and tractor yarding of 85-year-old second-growth redwood and Douglas-fir forest did not significantly affect large peak streamflows. The first streamflow peaks in the fall, however, were increas...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Scientific American
سال: 1921
ISSN: 0036-8733
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican06181921-485